By Now, Weary Rangers Fans Know the Score (It’s Probably 2-1)



It has been 21 years since the Rangers last won the Stanley Cup, so their onslaught of 2-1 scores in the current postseason feels like an improvised Morse code reaching out to the past: 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1.

To review, as the Rangers battled past the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Washington Capitals, eight games ended with a 2-1 verdict. Six of them went the Rangers’ way, including all four of the contests they won in overtime. Doubtless believing they should not tamper with a winning formula, the Rangers beat the Tampa Bay Lightning, 2-1 (of course), at Madison Square Garden on Saturday in the first game of the Eastern Conference finals.

More remarkably, the Rangers, dating to the final two games of the 2014 Stanley Cup finals against the Los Angeles Kings, have played 15 consecutive playoff games decided by one goal — an N.H.L. record.
It is also a testament to how tough-minded the Rangers had to be in the first two rounds this spring, when it seemed as if they were constantly tied with the Penguins or the Capitals, or a goal ahead, or a goal behind.

“I think it helps us when we’re in that position almost every night that you keep your focus on the right things, and that’s what it comes down to,” Rangers goalie Henrik Lundqvist said after Saturday’s victory. “We all understand that every play matters throughout the game. We’re that close every game.”

It is a tough path to travel, and it hardly resembles what happened in 1994, when the Rangers won the Cup for the first time in 54 years.

In that postseason, the Rangers started off with a roar, pummeling the rival Islanders by matching 6-0 scores in the first two games of the first round before easing up and merely winning by 5-1 and 5-2 to complete a four-game sweep.

The second round, against the Capitals, was not all that different. The Rangers won the first three games of that series by 6-3, 5-2 and 3-0. It was only in Game 5, the series clincher, that the Rangers played a game decided by one goal. The 4-3 victory propelled them into the third round, against the Devils, and what turned out to be perhaps the most intense playoff series the Rangers have ever played.

Three of the seven games in that series were decided in overtime. And one of them did end in a 2-1 score, the Game 7 in which the Rangers’ Stephane Matteau sneaked the puck past the Devils’ Martin Brodeur and put the Rangers in the Stanley Cup finals.

That series, against the Vancouver Canucks, also went seven games, but only two were decided by one goal, including Game 7, when the Rangers prevailed, 3-2.

In their Cup run that season, the Rangers played 23 games, with six decided by one goal. The series against the Devils was like a death match, but still, that postseason was not as relentlessly tight as this one has been.

Nor were the 1997 playoffs, when the Rangers, with Mark Messier and Wayne Gretzky engaging in a last hurrah, made it to the conference finals before losing to the Philadelphia Flyers in five games. In that postseason, the Rangers played 15 games, and seven of them were decided by one goal. One of those one-goal games ended in a 2-1 score, with Adam Graves, like Matteau, scoring a wraparound goal against Brodeur in overtime in the conference semifinals to oust the Devils.

It took until 2012 for the Rangers to again advance as far as the conference finals, where they fell to the Devils in six games. Of the 20 games the Rangers played in that postseason, 13 were decided by one goal. A lot, but not close to what the Rangers are doing now.

As for last year’s postseason, when the Rangers made the Cup finals, they played 25 games, 11 of which had a one-goal margin. More precisely, seven of the final nine postseason games the Rangers played last year were decided by one goal, perhaps setting a pattern.

“That is the way the playoffs are,” Dominic Moore said on Saturday. “Just the margins are small, and they’re not for the faint of heart these games, for sure.”

A lot of the Rangers from last season’s squad are still with the team and have no doubt become used to these one-goal games — even if their fans are about to collapse.

Sumber:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/sports/hockey/by-now-weary-rangers-fans-know-the-score-its-probably-2-1.html?ref=sports

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

TUGAS III BAHASA INGGRIS BISNIS 2

I. Exercise 31 Page 119

1. Twelve-story
2. Language
3. Tree-act
4. Two-day
5. 79-piece
6. Five-shelve
7. 16-ounces each
8. Hold six-quart
9. Brick
10. Ten-speed

II. Exercise 32 Page 120
Enough

1. Enough people
2. French enough
3. Enough time
4. Fast enough
5. Soon enough
6. Early enough
7. Hard enough
8. Slowly enough
9. Enough flour
10. Enough books

III. Exercise 33 Page 121
Because/Because of

1. Because
2. Because
3. Because of
4. Because
5. Because of
6. Because of
7. Because of
8. Because
9. Because
10. Because of

IV. Exercise 34 Page 124
So/Such

1. So
2. Such
3. So
4. So
5. So
6. So
7.Such
8. So
9. Such
10. Such
11. So
12. So
13. Such
14. So
15. So

V. Exercise 35 Page 132
Passive Voice

1. The President is called everyday.
2. The Other members is being called by John.
3. Mr. Watson will be called tonight.
4. Considerable damage has been caused by the fire.
5. The supplies should be bought by the teacher for this class.

VI. Exercise 36 Page 135
Causative Verbs

1. Leave
2. Repaired
3. To type
4. Call
5. To point
6. Write
7. Lie
8. To send
9. Cut
10. Sign
11. Leave
12. Washed
13. Fixed
14. Published
15. To find

EXAMPLE OF ACTIVE-PASSIVE FORM



Simple Present Tense
Example: 
Active  : John meets Erica every two days
Passive: Erica are met by him every two days

Present Perfect Tense
Example:
Active  : Erica has met me
Passive: I have been met by her

Past Perfect Tense
Example:
Active  : John will meet me tomorrow
Passive: I will be met by him tomorrow

Simple Past Tense
Example:
Active  : She met them last years
Passive: They were met by her last years

Future Tense
Example:
Active  : I will eat noodle tomorrow
Passive: Noodle will be eaten by me tomorrow


  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS